outline two ethical issues from loftus and palmer research

Required fields are marked *. Middle The participants can be deceived into believing something that isn't there or isn't true. Furthermore, some It refutes the Loftus and Palmer study and believes the wording of questions does not effect the answer given. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); Very good Matt lots of detail and all of this is useful, fab! EWT is a legal term. The addition of false details to a memory of an event is referred to as confabulation. 1. However, in some way we Loftus and Palmer's (1974) study consisted of two laboratory experiments. They are not seeing all the other factors that affect memory and what else distorts or They were then asked specific questions, including the question About how fast were the cars going when they (hit/smashed/collided/bumped/contacted ) each other?. Students are not representative of the general population in a number of ways. Task 2- Outline any ethical issues found in the study conducted by Loftus and Palmer. Aug 10th, 2021 Published. 2 Why was Loftus and Palmers study artificial? Background informationLoftus & Palmer wanted to . Should an instance occur, the result could be devastating to your company's finances and reputation. [CDATA[ A further problem with the study was the use of students as participants. for this reason we can say that participants have the freewill to make the decisions that they make. In addition; they did not provide fully informed consent and were not aware of their right to withdraw form the study. For example, Milgram (1963), Zimbardo (1973). Milgrams infamous study conducted to the highest ethical peaks would not have provided such an insight of human obedience because it would have become completely ecologically invalid in real life we cannot simply withdraw from the research. and all watched the video from a same angle and for the same amount of time. Giving participants the right to withdraw does not just informing them that they can leave the studyat any time, but also informing them that they have the right to withdraw their results from the study at any time. No one outside of the experimentand ideally in the experiment tooshould be able to identify the participants from the results. We find out that memory isnt always accurate or Books You don't have any books yet. Elizabeth Loftus is a renowned American psychologist who specializes in understanding memory. 4c6a5403-d1fe-40bf-b06f-e31931e7a835 (image/jpeg) THE RESULTS SHOWED THAT THE ESTIMATES OF SPEED IN MPH WERE AGAIN HIGHER WHEN THE WORD SMASHED WAS USED. The sample in experiment 2 consistedof 150 undergraduate psychology students from the University of Washington. Independent variable: verb used in the question: How fast were the cars going when they verbeach other?. Findings: Participants who were asked how fast the cars were going when they smashed were more likely to report seeing broken glass. Advantages are: a study can be replicated by other researchers. in the Loftus and Palmer study, we can argue both sides of this debate. Loftus and Palmer did they by seeing, whether participants who heard more severe verbs in the, question would be more likely to incorrectly remember, like the first experiment, this also took place in a lab and, watched a car crash which lasted less than one minute in. It was a laboratory experiment in which there were 5 conditions. The first 50 people received the question: About standardisation and (note any relevant Using quantitative data is a good thing because it allows us to ways that do not suggest an answer to the person that they are interviewing. Participants who were asked the smashed question thought the cars were going faster than those who were asked the hit question. The independent variable was the type of question asked. Modern Therapy, 1 Main Street, Eatontown, Monmouth County, reconstruction of automobile destruction study. Q5 - Write a list of questions about the costs of HE study and the possible sources of financial support that you should ask each university/college that you are considering for your HE studies. characteristics, as they may have wanted to impress the experimenter. The debate that is being argued her is Reductionism strengths and weaknesses). This would have caused demand characteristics. Findings: Participants who were asked how fast the cars were going when they smashed were more likely to report seeing broken glass. consistently show leading questions can distort the memory on an individual. smashed had a higher speed estimate of 10 mph, This is the idea what Loftus and Palmers research was based on: our previous knowledge knowledge influences our memory. They called the study Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction (1974). The goal was to test the hypothesis that language used in eyewitness testimony can alter memory. talk about mundane (is the study consistent? Whereas, the human brain and its, altered when something is inputted into the memory and this can alter the output and re, Introductory Chemistry for Biosciences Foundation Year (FND03), Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Pharmacogenomics, Pharmacogenetics and Immunology (PH2502), Mathematics for engineering management (HG4MEM), Introduction to Macroeconomics (5R4Z0001), Introduction to English Language (EN1023), Special Educational Needs and Disability Assignment 1, Offer and Acceptance - Contract law: Notes with case law, Born in Blood and Fire - Chapter 5 (Progress) Reading Notes (SPAN100). This is because they are using their study, which was conducted One factor that might affect memory is previous theory/previous studies There was questions related There was none shown in the slides. The research is based upon Barletts schema theory, which suggests that memories can be influenced by the previous knowledge of a person. Aim: To test their hypothesis that the language used in eyewitness testimony can alter memory. show the effect of leading questions of memory. Hence; the wording of questions can actually distort someones memory. Ethnocentrism is the extent to which our worldview is biased by the values and standards of our own culture. Method: 150 students were shown a one minute film, which featured a car driving through the countryside followed by four seconds of a multiple traffic accident. Loftus and Palmer (1974) illustrates that eyewitness testimony can be unreliable as people are often influenced by leading questions. quantitative data can be a disadvantage, as it doesnt allow us to see all aspects of the study. In other words, eyewitness testimony might be biased by the way questions are asked after a crime is committed. The ethical issues in . //